What are the two main damage outcomes for anti-shipping weapons?

The focus on damage outcomes of anti-shipping weapons primarily revolves around their effectiveness in engaging maritime targets. The correct answer highlights two pivotal outcomes: damaging and destroying ships.

When employing anti-shipping weapons, the primary intent is often to incapacitate the target in such a way that it either cannot continue operations or is rendered permanently inoperative. Causing damage can range from minor impacts, which may temporarily disrupt a ship's functioning, to severe, debilitating strikes that lead to its destruction.

This duality reflects the objectives of modern naval warfare, where the capability to inflict serious harm or completely eliminate a threat on the seas is paramount. Options that include deterrence or immobilization, while relevant in broader strategic contexts, do not align as closely with the direct objectives of anti-shipping strikes. Such weapons are designed not just to deter with the threat of damage but actively cause substantial destruction to neutralize maritime threats effectively.